Login | Request Account (DAF staff only)

Modelling phenology to probe for trade-offs between frost and heat risk in lentil and faba bean

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

View Altmetrics

Lake, L., Chauhan, Y. S., Ojeda, J. J., Cossani, C. M., Thomas, D., Hayman, P. T. and Sadras, V. O. (2021) Modelling phenology to probe for trade-offs between frost and heat risk in lentil and faba bean. European Journal of Agronomy, 122 . p. 126154. ISSN 1161-0301

[img] PDF
Restricted to Repository staff only.

Access may be available via the Publisher's website or OpenAccess link.

Article Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126154

Publisher URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030120301611


Extreme temperatures at critical developmental phases reduce grain yield. Combinations of sowing date and cultivar that favour faster development reduce the likelihood of heat stress but increase the risk of frost at critical phases. Current models are unable to predict pulse yield in response to frost and heat, hence our focus on phenology. Our aim was to model phenological variation with sowing date and cultivar for lentil and faba bean against the climatic patterns of frost and heat in 45 Australian locations that spanned 29 °S-41 °S, 11−340 m.a.s.l., and 1−423 km to the coast. For both crops, modelled mean and standard deviation of time to flowering were close to actuals and mean prediction error was below 5%. Comparison of actual and modelled time to flowering returned: r = 0.89 (n = 121, P < 0.0001) and modelling efficiency = 0.73 for lentil, and r = 0.96 (n = 123, P < 0.0001) and modelling efficiency = 0.84 for faba bean. The critical period for yield determination was assumed to span from flowering to 200 °Cd after flowering. Curves fitted to the time-course of frost (< 0 °C) and heat (> 34 °C) probabilities between 1957 and 2018 were used to estimate the date of 10 % frost probability and the date of 30 % heat probability as the boundaries of a frost-heat risk window for the critical period. Out of the 45 locations, 12 were frost-free but with risk of heat, 7 were heat-free but with risk of frost, 3 were frost- and heat-free, and 23 featured a window defined by both frost and heat boundaries. Frost variables discriminated locations more strongly than heat variables. Geographical patterns in thermal regimes emerged that were associated with latitude, altitude and continentality. Realised warming between 1957 and 2018 advanced the time to 200 °Cd after flowering and shortened the critical period in most locations, particularly in early-sown crops. Comparisons of the probability curves of frost and heat between 1957–1985 and 1986–2018 showed, with few exceptions, an asymmetry between delayed late frost (up to 44 d) and earlier heat onset (up to 11 d), with a narrowing of the frost-heat risk window from 46 to 90 d for the period 1957–1985 to 34–64 d for 1986–2018. We identified a dominant role of frost as (i) the main discriminating factor among geographically distinct locations, (ii) the main source of variation of the frost-heat window, and (iii) a putatively increased risk factor with climate change. Adaptation to frost in the critical period for yield is important for pulses despite warming trends. Increased frost tolerance can directly improve yield and indirectly contribute to reduce risk of heat and drought later in the season.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Trade-off Climate change Risk Flowering
Subjects:Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agricultural meteorology. Crops and climate
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Methods and systems of culture. Cropping systems
Plant culture > Food crops
Plant culture > Field crops
Live Archive:12 Oct 2020 05:36
Last Modified:03 Sep 2021 16:46

Repository Staff Only: item control page


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics