Login | Request Account (DAF staff only)

Tools to manage climate risk in cropping (Australia).

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

Cox, H., Voil, P.D. and Rodriguez, D. (2008) Tools to manage climate risk in cropping (Australia). In: Empowerment of the rural actors: a renewal of farming systems perspectives: 8th European IFSA Symposium, 6-10 July 2008, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Full text not currently attached. Access may be available via the Publisher's website or OpenAccess link.

Publisher URL: http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/index.php?id=42

Abstract

Because of the variable and changing environment, advisors and farmers are seeking systems that provide risk management support at a number of time scales. The Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit, Toowoomba, Australia has developed a suite of tools to assist advisors and farmers to better manage risk in cropping. These tools range from simple rainfall analysis tools (Rainman, HowWet, HowOften) through crop simulation tools (WhopperCropper and YieldProphet) to the most complex, APSFarm, a whole-farm analysis tool. Most are derivatives of the APSIM crop model. These tools encompass a range of complexity and potential benefit to both the farming community and for government policy. This paper describes, the development and usage of two specific products; WhopperCropper and APSFarm. WhopperCropper facilitates simulation-aided discussion of growers' exposure to risk when comparing alternative crop input options. The user can readily generate 'what-if' scenarios that separate the major influences whilst holding other factors constant. Interactions of the major inputs can also be tested. A manager can examine the effects of input levels (and Southern Oscillation Index phase) to broadly determine input levels that match their attitude to risk. APSFarm has been used to demonstrate that management changes can have different effects in short and long time periods. It can be used to test local advisors and farmers' knowledge and experience of their desired rotation system. This study has shown that crop type has a larger influence than more conservative minimum soil water triggers in the long term. However, in short term dry periods, minimum soil water triggers and maximum area of the various crops can give significant financial gains.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Corporate Creators:Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation (DEEDI), Agri-Science, Crop and Food Science , QPIF
Business groups:Crop and Food Science
Keywords:Advisory officers; climatic change; crop production; simulation, risk management.
Subjects:Technology > Technology (General)
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agricultural meteorology. Crops and climate
Live Archive:15 Feb 2010 07:02
Last Modified:03 Sep 2021 16:43

Repository Staff Only: item control page