Login | Request Account (DAF staff only)

Economic evaluation of sugarcane harvesting best practice (HBP)

Share this record

Add to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to XAdd to WechatAdd to Microsoft_teamsAdd to WhatsappAdd to Any

Export this record

Thompson, M., Nothard, B., Patane, P., Landers, G. and Norris, C. A. (2019) Economic evaluation of sugarcane harvesting best practice (HBP). In: 41st Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Conference, ASSCT 2019, 30 April - 3 May 2019, University of Southern Queensland (USQ)Toowoomba; Australia.



Mechanical sugarcane harvesting is commonly undertaken at ground speeds that exceed the cleaning capacity of modern harvesters, which is likely to increase extraneous matter (EM) levels in the cane supply. To attempt to reduce the higher EM levels, operators typically increase extractor fan speeds above recommendations, resulting in unintended cane loss. Past research indicates that using harvesting best practice (HBP) settings can minimise cane loss and stool damage. These benefits would increase grower revenue and be an incentive for growers to request harvesting contractors operate using HBP settings. Reduced ground speeds would, however, increase harvesting time and generate higher costs per hectare. The key issue remains as to whether the increased grower revenues outweigh the additional harvesting costs. Nine replicated and randomised trials undertaken by Sugar Research Australia in 2017 compared harvesting performance when using both conventional and HBP settings through identifying production and grower revenue differences. Detailed information was collected from each harvesting operation to identify harvesting costs under both conventional practice and HBP. This allowed the net benefit for the grower and harvesting operation from using HBP settings to be determined. On average over the nine trials, recommended harvesting settings generated more grower revenue than the added harvesting costs from reducing ground speeds and generated a net economic benefit of $163/ha (or $1.97/t). The trials show that, while growers would need to pay additional compensation for cane harvested using HBP settings, the compensation would be less than the additional revenue they received, increasing overall grower profitability. © 2019 Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. All rights reserved.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Business groups:Agriculture
Keywords:Cane loss Economics Harvesting best practice Harvesting costs Profitability Cost reduction Engineers Sugar cane Australia Best practices Economic benefits Economic evaluations Ground speed Harvesting operations Key Issues Harvesting
Subjects:Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Agricultural economics
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Methods and systems of culture. Cropping systems
Plant culture > Field crops > Sugar plants
Live Archive:05 Feb 2020 03:20
Last Modified:19 Feb 2024 05:14

Repository Staff Only: item control page


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics