Login | Create Account (DAF staff only)

Evaluating and validating abundance monitoring methods in the absence of populations of known size: review and application to a passive tracking index

Allen, Lee R. and Engeman, Richard M. (2015) Evaluating and validating abundance monitoring methods in the absence of populations of known size: review and application to a passive tracking index. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22 (4). pp. 2907-2915. ISSN 0944-1344

Full text not currently attached. Access may be available via the Publisher's website or OpenAccess link.

Article Link(s): http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3567-3

Abstract

Rarely is it possible to obtain absolute numbers in free-ranging populations and although various direct and indirect methods are used to estimate abundance, few are validated against populations of known size. In this paper, we apply grounding, calibration and verification methods, used to validate mathematical models, to methods of estimating relative abundance. To illustrate how this might be done, we consider and evaluate the widely applied passive tracking index (PTI) methodology. Using published data, we examine the rationality of PTI methodology, how conceptually animal activity and abundance are related and how alternative methods are subject to similar biases or produce similar abundance estimates and trends. We then attune the method against populations representing a range of densities likely to be encountered in the field. Finally, we compare PTI trends against a prediction that adjacent populations of the same species will have similar abundance values and trends in activity. We show that while PTI abundance estimates are subject to environmental and behavioural stochasticity peculiar to each species, the PTI method and associated variance estimate showed high probability of detection, high precision of abundance values and, generally, low variability between surveys, and suggest that the PTI method applied using this procedure and for these species provides a sensitive and credible index of abundance. This same or similar validation approach can and should be applied to alternative relative abundance methods in order to demonstrate their credibility and justify their use.

Item Type:Article
Business groups:Biosecurity Queensland
Subjects:Science > Statistics
Science > Zoology
Agriculture > Agriculture (General) > Conservation of natural resources
Deposited On:25 Sep 2014 02:16
Last Modified:01 Jun 2016 06:54

Repository Staff Only: item control page